Monday, February 25, 2019

PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

PagSeguro Digital Ltd.  (NYSE:PAGS)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 21, 2019, 5:30 p.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Hello, everyone, and thank you for waiting. Welcome to PagSeguro's Fourth Quarter 2018 and Full Year Results Conference Call. This event is being recorded and all participants will be in a listen-only during the company's presentation. After PagSeguro's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. At that time, further instructions will be given. (Operator Instructions) This event is also being broadcast live via webcast and maybe accessed through PagSeguro's website at investors.pagseguro.com, where the presentation is also available. Participants may view the slides in any order they wish. The replay will be available shortly after the event is concluded. Those following the presentation via webcast may post their questions on PagSeguro's website.

Before proceeding, let me mention that any forward-looking statements included in the presentation or mentioned on this conference call are based on currently available information and PagSeguro's current assumptions, expectations and projections about future events. While PagSeguro believes that their assumptions, expectations and projections are reasonable in view of currently available information, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those included in PagSeguro's presentation or discussed on this conference call for a variety of reasons, including those described in this forward-looking statements in the Risk Factors section of PagSeguro's registration statement on Form F-1 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available on PagSeguro's Investor Relations website.

Finally, I would like to remind you that during this conference call, the company may discuss some non-GAAP measures. For more details, the foregoing non-GAAP measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are presented in the last page of this webcast presentation.

Now, I'll turn the conference over to Mr. Ricardo Dutra, CEO. Mr. Dutra, you may begin your presentation.

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Hello, everyone, and welcome to our fourth quarter and full year 2018 results conference call. Today, I have here with me Eduardo Alcaro, our CFO; and Andre Cazotto, our Head of Investor Relations.

Before we go through the operational and financial metrics, we start our presentation highlights in the great achievement of the year. It was an year of intense competition with our competitors relatively trying to copy our business model. When we did our IPO, potential investors were so surprised with our historic growth, but somewhere skeptical about our ability to deliver the numbers that we are committed.

Having said that, I would like to remind you that 2018 IPO projections that we shared with the sell side research analysts in September 2017 before the IPO and the actual numbers delivered in 2018. Net income and net revenue was 17% higher than the projections shared with the sell side research analysts. TPV 19% higher than the projections shared with the sell side research analysts.

Moving to the next slide, these are the main highlights of 2018. Our full year GAAP net income reached BRL910 million, up 90% year-over-year. And non-GAAP net income BRL1.068 billion, a 122% (sic-123%) growth year-over-year. Our non-GAAP net revenue reached BRL4.2 billion, up 67% year-over-year. Our TPV region BRL76 billion, growing BRL38 billion or 98% year-over-year. The largest growth among listed payment companies in Brazil.

We also ended 2018 with 4.1 million active merchants, adding 1.3 million new clients throughout the year. (inaudible) with a broad ecosystem and also our execution capability. Non-GAAP net margin of 25.4%, an increase of 6.4 percentage points comparing to previous year, showing our strong commitment to growing in a sustainable way and with own execution.

Engagement is a key metric for the company, giving that almost 80% of our merchants never accepted cards before. Our goal is to be the merchant sign (ph) destination. In December 2018, more than 20% of our active merchants were already using at least one additional products beside the card services.

We also ended 2018 with the best rated app at 4.8 stars on Google and Apple Stores, according to more than 300,000 reviews, reinforcing our commitment in delivering top-class user experience.

Talking about our brand recognition, PAGS had the strongest brand in Brazilian payment with the 7.5 times more searches than second peer according to Google Trends Financials Category. Being the first mover in mobile phones with non-replicable online distribution through UOL that holds 84% of the Brazilian demo guidance, giving the natural advantage to PagSeguro.

Talking about our ecosystem, we ended the year with more than 130 updates in our app and 15 new main products launched such as bill payments, mobile top-up, lending, QR code and instant transfers, among others that happened to increase customer engagement. We also launched a three new POS devices, Minizinha Chip, Moderninha Plus and the Smart POS. PAGS offers the most complete range of terminals in Brazilian market, which also helping us to reach more clients.

Our net cash used in operating activities was BRL25.7 million of negative, close to breakeven after adding back the repayment of BRL1.7 billion in early payment receivables from issuing banks. We continue to observe a higher adoption of our ecosystem being translated in more transactions. We ended Q4 with an average spending per merchant of BRL6,200, up 19% year-over-year. We believe the adoption of additional functionalities through the digital account will be translated in higher stickiness and more transactions.

Finally, PagSeguro has proving that operating and winning in the long tail requires an online and mobile approach that is totally different from the traditional client business model and new competitors that were attracted to the market of our IPO. We operate in a brand new market that we created in which you have a long way to go. Constantly putting into practice our vision to disrupt and democratize financial services through technology and innovation.

On slide five, we have our total payment volume that reached BRL24.6 billion in fourth quarter, an increase of BRL11 billion, up at 81% year-over-year and BRL4.4 million or 22% quarter-over-quarter, accelerating when compared to the BRL3.4 billion or 20% growth observed in Q3. This growth is the result of a greater penetration of our persistingly long-tail combined with the trend of cash plus the conversion that is still at the beginning in our merchant base with lots of room to grow in Brazil with flip side as cross-selling products and services to our clients.

The net take rate, which is the blended take rate net from transactions costs such as interchange processing and cards scheme fees finished 3% in Q4 2018 or 25 basis points down when compared to previous quarter. Important to highlight that take rate is the result of all paying merchants and may change according to the payment mix of credit and debit. The 25 basis points decrease does not mean they are in their price pressure, as we can see on the top right of the slide. Our prices are credit interest paid and any one can check we are not taking our annual guidance out.

Most of the contraction is related to product mix. In Q4, due to seasonality with third-rate salary in consumer behavior in related terms. So as an increase in debit card volume and the decrease in credit card volume with the installments that generates the prepayment income. That's the reason why take rates of our financial income was impacted even with no changes in the price of the discounted rate of 2.99% per month. Due to these effects, change in the mix, you can see there was a 21 basis point increase in financial income take rate from 1.91% to 1.70% from Q3 to Q4.

On the chart below, we see the number of active merchants. Just to remember the culture here internally, active merchants are build who made at least one single transaction in the last 12 months. We ended the fourth quarter with 4.1 million active merchants, adding almost 1.3 million new merchants year-on-year who are preventing an increase of 48% year-over-year. Quarter-over-quarter, we added 308,000 new merchants, in line with the numbers that we commented in last conference call.

Important to mention that in Q4, we intensified promotion campaigns, even the Black Friday and holiday season holidays. We will continue evaluating the best way to win the merchants considering their lifetime value.

Next chart, we have the evolution of our average spending per merchant that reached BRL6,200 in Q4, a growth of 19% year-over-year and 12% quarter-over-quarter, also accelerating when compared to the growth observed in Q3. This is explained by the higher adoption curve of electronic payments in our merchant base, which is an expected trend, higher engagement in our ecosystem, in converting more transactions in TPV. Just reminding what I said in my initial remarks, most of our merchants did not accept cards before joining PagSeguro.

On the next slide, we show the evolution of our TPV growth compared to other leases acquired in Brazil. It shows we are growing faster than acquires that are working in the tradition SME and corporate market and it proves we are in the right track and it's exceeding our strategy accordingly.

Now, I'd like to pass the word for our CFO, Eduardo Alcaro.

Eduardo Alcaro -- Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Officer

Thanks, Ricardo; and hello, everyone. Before I start on slide number seven, I'd like to revisit the guidance shared in our previous conference call. Our Q4 GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income reached BRL303 million and BRL323 million, respectively. For the full year, our GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income reached BRL910 million and BRL1.61 billion, respectively. Delivering numbers above the top of the guidance shows our focus in stronger growth and EPS accretion.

Now, before I go through the financial metrics, I would like to mention that in the fourth quarter of 2018, we had a total of BRL20.6 million of non-GAAP items, mainly related to our stock-based long-term incentive plan in line with the guidance that we provided you in our last conference call in November. For more details, the foregoing non-GAAP measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are presented in the last page of this webcast presentation.

On the top left of slide number eight, our non-GAAP total net revenue reached BRL1.267 billion in the fourth quarter at 53% year-over-year. Moving to the top right, we have our main revenue stream composed by transaction services or mainly MDR collected from merchants, our initial income from the prepayments and hardware sales. In the fourth quarter of 2018, transaction and services represented 58%, financial Income 34% and hardware sales only 8% over total net revenue that continues to trend down, especially because we intensified the promotional campaigns during the Q4, given the holiday seasonality and in related terms going forward should reach low fee revision.

On the other hand, for the full year, you can note that our revenues from transaction activities and other services grew 7 percentage points compared to 2017. On the chart below, we present our non-GAAP total costs and expenses decreased 0.8 percentage points year-over-year and the fourth quarter at 3.3% over total TPV. Related to the non-GAAP admin expenses over total TPV reached 0.3%, a decrease of 0.1 percentage points year-over-year. For the full year, total costs and expenses reached 3.5% over total TPV, a decrease of 1.3 percentage points year-over-year. Related to non-GAAP admin expenses over total TPV reached 0.3%, a decrease of 0.1 percentage points year-over-year.

On the next slide, we show our non-GAAP net income growth. In the fourth quarter, we reached BRL323 million, an increase of BRL135 million and up 72% year-over-year. The non-GAAP net margin reached 26%, an increase of 2.8 percentage points year-over-year. For the full year, PAGS reached BRl1.68 billion, an increase of BRL589 million and up 123% year-over-year. The non-GAAP margin reached 25%, an increase of 6.4 percentage points year-over-year. This shows the unique profile of PAGS delivering growth and profitability.

On slide 10, regarding our cash flow, our net cash used in operating activities in the year-ended December 31, 2018. totaled BRL1.763 billion. It is important to mention that adding back BRL1.737 billion from not receivables have reached -- we received early payment from issuing banks as of December 31, 2017, that we've repaid during 2018 with our IPO primary share proceeds.

Our net cash used in operating activities would have been negative BRL25.7 million, very close to the breakeven level after all the investments in working capital throughout the year. PAGS ended the year with receivables from credit card issuers that are very liquid with the amount of BRL8.1 billion and payables to merchants of BRL4.3 billion. A net working capital of BRL3.8 billion flows almost BRL2.8 billion in cash.

Finally, on the next slide, we highlight the license issued by the Central Bank. On December 2014, PAGS applied to the Central Bank authorizations to operate as the payment institution, both as an acquired and as a digital payments account service providers, an issuer of prepaid electronic money. In October 2018, the Brazilian Central Bank granted all license we applied in December 2014.

More recently, in January of 2019, PAGS announced after the approval from the Central Bank in CADE, the Brazilian antitrust entity, the acquisition of BBN, a Brazilian, almost no operating bank that holds a banking license. The object of this banking license is day-to-day business, to simplify the offering of financial products and services to our companies.

Now, I would like to hand over back to Ricardo.

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Eduardo. On slide 12, we highlight our roadmap of products delivered through 2018. It was an intense and hardworking year and I'd like to say that we have now the most complete ecosystem for own payment market we're just starting. Being an independent company allow us to think exclusively on our clients financial needs by delivering growth and profitability simultaneously and operating unique ecosystem through our digital account. We expect to deliver in 2018 some critical new enhancements to take our ecosystem to the next level. Before you ask, we cannot disclose the data at this point due to competition, that is systematically trying to copy us. However, we will provide you more color in the coming quarter calls.

On slide 13, we introduced TILIX. On January, PAGS acquired 100% of TILIX and that helps managing bill payments. From utility to flex bills, TILIX offers a simple and user-friendly interface to manage bill payments and will be fully integrated now in digital account act in the following month.

On the next slide, we have marked our portfolio of functionalities already available to our motion. PagSeguro has been building a unique and world-class payment ecosystem focused to deliver efficiencies online and physical payment experience. Recently, we launched our lending product PAGS Capital. We just started and we are still testing our model with a very small pool of clients, eligible according to some companies such as accounting history, TPV, payment frequency and so on. On average, PAGS charge rates almost 3 times lower than traditional bank. We are extremely distressed (ph) and for now this product is marginal to our financial results and we expect it to increase the stickiness and loyalty of our clients.

In November, we also complemented our cash-in and cash-out process through the digital account, allowing instance transfer fund in 200 Brazilian banks.

On next slide, you can see the strength of our brand. PAGS is the first mover in this market and the fact it can access UOLs, the third largest online orders in Brazil, only behind Google and Facebook, with more than 84% Internet reach as of October 2018 to promote our products and solutions in long-tail market helping PAGS to reach unique brand recognition. In the past 12 months, according to Google Trends, featuring by the Financial Category, we have an average of approximately 7.5 times higher searches than the second peer. PAGS reached a level of brand awareness where the business have the word of mouth effect and consequently we have lower acquisition cost when compared to our competitors.

Being the first mover, having a fully verticalized and low cost ecosystem with 4.1 million active merchants, mobile first, strong brand, focus in user experience, the best rated financial services app Google and Apple stores and non-replicable online distribution through UOL brings a natural advantage and leadership in long-tail market.

Finally, on last slide, we show our guidance for the full year 2019 with no changes compared to what we presented last November. We expect to deliver a GAAP net income in the range of $1.182 billion to $1.36 billion and the non-GAAP net income between $1.322 billion to $1.5 billion. Management is committed to the top of the guidance, which means 40% growth over 2018 and the management (ph) despite to the top of the guidance.

Now, we finish our presentation to start the Q&A session.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Craig Maurer, Autonomous. You may proceed.

Craig Maurer -- Autonomous Research -- Analyst

Yes. Thanks for taking the time. I wanted to understand the impact of the cut (technical difficulty) numbers and product setup in quarter? Thanks.

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Hi. This is Ricardo. Thank you for the question. We are passing the decrease in price, in cost, so to say, for the new motion. But for most of that we already having the base, we are charging the same prices that we had before tracking position. So the full price is 2.29% for the old customers and 1.99 for new customers. So, again, that's sort of question -- for new customers we are having this promotion for the first 12 months of this customers with PagSeguro.

Craig Maurer -- Autonomous Research -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you.

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question comes from Bryan Keane, Deutsche Bank. You may proceed.

Bryan Keane -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Yeah. Hi, guys. Wanted to ask, there was lots of promotions in the fourth quarter, so just curious on what happened to activation rates due to some of the discounting? And then, secondly, what do you guys picking now for net new merchant adds going forward in 2019?

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Hi, Bryan, thank you for the question. We didn't see a decrease in activation when compared with Q2 and Q3. We know that part of the devices that people bought, they do activate in January, because probably they choose in January or because they decided not to do in December. But as we did not decrease the price, so we have very low price where people just buy and leave it without using the device. We didn't see the decrease in activation rates.

Bryan Keane -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Okay. And then, any thoughts on going forward on that new merchant adds, what you guys are planning to do per quarter?

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. Well, we -- according to our business plan, we plan to end 2019 with 5.1 million active merchants. So it's going to be a growth of 1 million this year. If we have any change, we would let you know in the following calls, but so far we are sticking with this plan and we do expect -- we do really believe the 5.1 million active merchants by the end of 2019.

Eduardo Alcaro -- Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Officer

And, Bryan, as a matter of fact, this 5.1 million active merchants is the exactly same number that we shared with you when we did the IPO for 2019.

Bryan Keane -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Okay. And just my last question on net take rate, it sounds like it was mostly mix and not anything you guys are doing at price, but just could you maybe help us understand that to make sure that's correct?

Eduardo Alcaro -- Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Officer

Yeah. Most of the compression is related to product mix. If you look at the chart that we presented, chart number five, we can see that from the 25 basis points decrease, 21 basis points came from the financial income, so most of the impact comes from this mix change. If you look at our website, you can see that we didn't change the price at all. Also worth to say that we did not change the financial income rate that we charge, the prepayment rate, 2.99%, it was really -- the big impact was the -- the change in the mix. Our revenue is also worth to say that our net take rate is still very high when compared to other players in the market. We're sure that we are in a very -- in totally different type of motion. We are talking about 3%, while others are talking about lower than 2% or even lower than 1%, so we still highlight that we are in a very different market. We are focusing on the long-tail and going back to the question, we changed mainly due to change in the mix.

Bryan Keane -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks for taking my questions.

Eduardo Alcaro -- Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Next question from Rafael Frade, Bradesco.

Rafael Frade -- Bradesco BBI -- Analyst

Hi, good morning. Probably my question is still related to the mix, but not in the big split, I understand that the interchange on that went out this quarter. I would expect to see a strong reduction in transaction costs, just to understand why all (technical difficulty) with same year that was impacted in transactional costs in the quarter? And the second thing would be related to the guidance for 2019. So your winter rate guidance, but given the strong results that you have given so far, it seems that the gadgets imply big acceleration over the year. I just -- if you could share some thoughts about what you are seeing in the guidance in terms of maybe, a little more pressure in price or cost, so anything that could help us on the guidance for 2019? Thank you.

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Okay. Thank you for the question. I'll talk about the debt interchange that you asked and Eduardo is going to answer about the guidance. As I said before, part of the adventures that we're having with lower debt interchange, we are talking to the new merchants as a promotion, but for our clients that we already had in the base before we are changing the full price. When we look at the chart in the slide number five, we still had more installment transaction, we would see a higher take rate in the financial income portion, but also in the net revenue from transactions, because the end value is higher there. So when we had more transactions in debt, what happens is, if in the absolute numbers we see a decrease in the net transactions from net investment services, so let me go back to that (technical difficulty) internal rates. We are factoring part of this debt interchange to new merchants and not for the older ones. And part of the change in Q4 was because of the financial income and change in the -- we are not changing price, we are not taking MDRs down, not even the MDR for the transaction or for the financial income.

Eduardo Alcaro -- Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Officer

Frade, about the guidance, like we said during the presentation, the company is committed with the top of the range of the guidance and the management annual bonus is linked to the top of the range of the guidance. The top of the guidance means the 40% net income growth for 2019 and is 13% above our projections that we shared with sell-side research analysts during the IPO. We believe that this is remarkable after all the noise and players in the market that were constantly trying to copy us, And just to confirm it, Frade, as you can see in our numbers, we think (inaudible) self-bidding on the terminals and we are hoping that the new products and solutions.

So at the end of the day, our primary focus is EPS accretion and we want to keep winning, our merchant thinking about their lifetime value and launching new products and functionalities. We expect higher engagement and adoption of our transaction benefiting from the migration from cash to plastic and it is a real opportunity for us to cross-sell additional financial services, such as lending, QR code payments and you can name it, all the products that we launched throughout the year.

Rafael Frade -- Bradesco BBI -- Analyst

Okay. Perfect. Thank you.

Operator

Next question comes from Felipe Salomao, Citibank. You may proceed.

Felipe Salomao -- Citibank -- Analyst

Hi. Good night. I also have a question on the net accrued coming from financial income. So you mentioned that the transaction rates was driven by seasonal reduction on the number of instalment reductions and that price has been renewed and changed now as you can easily check on the website, but my question is why do you think that -- at this change on transaction mix during 4Q18 -- what are the qualitative reasons for the average customer bill pay, largely with -- I don't know -- credit card and online transactions and not with debit cards. And if you think that we should see a migration to, let's say, to the historical average in the next quarter and should we see -- I mean the installments in becoming more relevant as a percentage of the total mix in the first Q 2019? That's my first question.

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Okay. In Brazil, it's very usual that in Q4 people use more debit then credit, because of the seasonality and also because of the consumer behavior and usually people will feel very petite salary in December, so they have money to use debit cards instead of credit card. So it's very seasonal movement that we've seen in the industry in Q4, so more that debit transactions when compared to Q3 and Q2 and Q1. Typically, looking forward, in January, we are seeing better take rate, higher than the 2%. It is not the same as the Q3, because we're still having debit card transactions, but it is between the Q3 and Q4. So that is not a trend that is going down, most of them, so that's all we see so far.

Felipe Salomao -- Citibank -- Analyst

Okay. Perfect. Thanks for sharing some color on that. The second question I have is actually regarding the banking lock and there has been a debate about what's going to happen at the banking lock and Central Bank published a piece of regulation, I mean they are not regulating that kind of contract, but the industry has been discussing about it, the Central Bank has decided to postpone the implantation of the new banking act regulations. So could you please share with us, I guess, any of the date and what are your views on what should we be the final outcome of this regulatory change profile for -- probably for the industry? Thank you.

Andre Cazotto -- Head of Investor Relations

Hey, Felipe. It's Andre speaking. How are you? For PAGS, the dates are neutral impact, first because many of our merchants do all, let's say, all underserviced by the traditional financial institution (technical difficulty) kind of merchants that have, let's say, a loan higher than the traditional bank and once that bank remember that 100% of -- our merchants, they own our digital account for a 100% of its transaction are safe, directed through the PAGS digital account. So if this merchants have another banking accounts, you can transfer from our digital accounts directly to traditional bank. So given that we have these vertical close loop, let's say, that these discussions around the banking lockup would be neutral for the company. Okay.

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Okay. And just to complement, it's important to let (inaudible) the business model only allows merchants to settle the instalment theme, (technical difficulty) due plus 40 and due plus 30. So the prepayment already automatic and we do not offer the option to decrease instalments. And also, thinking about the long-tail versions, Felipe, they are not sophisticated and less price sensitive in the prepayment. So their priority is relatively different factor as possible. So remember that for the merchant billing, 50 day VRs (ph) per day or 20,000 VRs per year is not even execution for them to -- from a cost standpoint to deal, I think real opportunity for them.

Felipe Salomao -- Citibank -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you. Thank you very much for the answers.

Operator

Next question comes from Josh Beck with KeyBanc. You may proceed.

Josh Beck -- KeyBanc -- Analyst

Thank you for the question. I wanted to ask about, I think you said net add number of 1 million for 2019, which would imply about 250,000 per quarter. It's certainly a little bit less than what we've seen in 2018. Is that explained by the fact that your series of merchants is larger and instantly harder to produce net adds? Or are there other factors at work here?

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Hi, Josh. Thank you for the question. We have not seen deceleration. We cannot give you guide, there is more competition for them there. But by far we are the leader in this type of marketing long-tail portion, long-tail market. So, yeah, you have more players in the market and part of the net adds, for sure, we will capture, but we still are the leader talking about 200,000 or 250,000 per quarter, so good number and we'll compare with that as it's much higher than what we are predicting and reporting. So it's not because we're going up in the period and getting larger merchants, it is natural that we have more players into the marketing who are kind of dividing with new net adds with all the other players in the market.

Eduardo Alcaro -- Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Officer

So just allow me one additional commentary here, Josh. It's very important to mention that we are not giving clients strong (technical difficulty) filling clients from PAGS. Our churn rates remain pretty much stable, OK. I think that as we have more competition in terms of adding new merchants to the system and like we discussed that before, it is clear, big -- let's say, blue ocean in this market. According to public data, we should have in Brazil around Latin 12 new micro-merchants combined that with more than 20 million, 25 million individuals and for sure I think that there are market when we would take that. I think that we can have competition, but like Ricardo mentioned, in the end PAGS will continue to deepen in this market.

Andre Cazotto -- Head of Investor Relations

And, Josh, just a final comment here, when we did our IPO, we had a business plan of 5.1 million active merchants by the end of 2019 and we continue to be comfortable with this number by the end of 2019.

Josh Beck -- KeyBanc -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you for the color there. Towards the back of your slide presentation, you walked through a number of different features, things like bill payments, mobile top-up, peer-to-peer payments, a number of others. I'm just wondering, can you give us an update on maybe how many of your merchants have updated -- sorry, have adopted one of these services? And what's the interest level if you can share your update there that would be great?

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, Josh. When you look at December figures, more than 20% of our merchants are using at least one of the features, some of them are using more than one, but it's a little bit more than 20%. It is increasing every month. Part of this feature may help us in terms of financials arriving reported to -- irrelevant for the business. We see that is the way to increase the loyalty, increase the stimulus (ph) and have a more complete requisition program there, because at the end of the day that's what makes us different than other players into the market and they will in constraint in launching products to compete with parent companies and things like that. So going back to your question, 20% usually in December and it is growing month-after-month.

Josh Beck -- KeyBanc -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you very much.

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Next question comes from Domingos Falavina with JPMorgan.

Domingos Falavina -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

Thank you, Ricardo and Cazotto for picking the question. It's actually two questions. I wanted to follow up to Frade's question. From (technical difficulty) basically what's bringing the points that we change what's -- starting October and you mentioned that the revenues are going through this income statement is because we pass on the benefit to clients. But what -- my problems that reconciling that is, new book that interchange other cost, so we should see the operating expenses, specifically cost of services coming down and not one being netted out of the other one in revenue. So my first question is, why didn't you see this cost line coming down and am I understanding probably wrongly how your B2C book these account in your income statement. And if you could add to build the basic convention in debit costs pressured by marketing campaigns and et cetera. So which line exactly is booked in these -- within the -- leverage part of the margin expenses there.

Eduardo Alcaro -- Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Officer

Hi, Domingos. This is Alcaro speaking. When you look at the cost of transactions, we don't have only see the change interchange fees there. We have also purchasing costs and we have card scheme fees. So only bid -- with the interchange is the biggest part of the equation, but is not the only part of the equation. And about marketing expenses, they are both in the marketing expenses line, they are nothing to do with the cost of transactions, so cost of transactions is processing with either change and it is also card scheme fees.

Domingos Falavina -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

So I guess my question is, I am collecting a understanding that at discount that going to client does not explain why the cost and service -- cost of service do not come down below interchange?

Eduardo Alcaro -- Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Officer

Well, as Ricardo said, we are passing part of the saving that we having to new customers by charging 1.99% per month and we are not changing that 2.29% that we for the existing client and you can see by our website, since our prices are public.

Domingos Falavina -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

The second question is, (technical difficulty) from five month, I just wanted to hear your thoughts about competitive landscape, obviously on the street you have a very large footprint. I'm sure you do have some in large corporates and my question is more on the qualitative side. All we've seen -- do you see competition working through September to December and December -- especially now in February and how would you comment -- separate the comparative that's working in large motion in last year and focus area which is smaller merchants.

Eduardo Alcaro -- Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Officer

We have seen the competition similar to what we had last year with some players decreasing the price of devices. We are well positioned in terms of the features and also in terms of pricing. We are not leading prices down in terms of devices that we follow some prices into the point you think it's going to be accretive when we compare the cost of acquisition versus the lifetime value. Competition, I would say, similar to what we had last year, we see them growing and the opposite, some of the brands are not in custody and things like that. So we didn't see any big changes. We are following -- sticking with the plan as we said 1 million in motion this year and feels had we had in 2018.

Domingos Falavina -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

This concludes today's question-and-answer session. I would like to invite Mr. Ricardo Dutra to proceed with his closing statements. Please go ahead, sir.

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Let us conclude the PagSeguro Result Conference Call for today. Thank you very much for participation. Have a good night, and thank you for using Chorus Call. Thank you very much, everyone.

Duration: 46 minutes

Call participants:

Ricardo Dutra da Silva -- Chief Executive Officer

Eduardo Alcaro -- Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Investor Relations Officer

Craig Maurer -- Autonomous Research -- Analyst

Bryan Keane -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Rafael Frade -- Bradesco BBI -- Analyst

Felipe Salomao -- Citibank -- Analyst

Andre Cazotto -- Head of Investor Relations

Josh Beck -- KeyBanc -- Analyst

Domingos Falavina -- JPMorgan -- Analyst

More PAGS analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Sunday, February 24, 2019

Berkshire earnings estimate cut in half because of Kraft mess

The release of Warren Buffett's annual letter is clouded this year as investors confront an unpleasant last-minute surprise.

That's because the earnings outlook for the Warren Buffett-owned company just took a big hit courtesy of problems at Kraft Heinz, one of the crown jewels in the Oracle of Omaha's investing empire. Berkshire investors get the opportunity in the next couple of days to hear Buffett discuss the state of the company both from his letter and in a CNBC interview Monday.

Berkshire owns 27 percent of the food and beverage giant, with the stake worth about $14 billion as of Thursday's close. A 28 percent slide for Kraft Heinz shares Friday morning, however, cost Berkshire about $3.9 billion.

show chapters Morningstar's Erin Lash dissects Kraft Heinz's earnings miss Morningstar's Erin Lash dissects Kraft Heinz's earnings miss    4 Hours Ago | 04:49

Analyst Jay Gelb at Barclays on Friday sliced his earnings per share estimates in half for Berkshire Hathaway, anticipating that Kraft Heinz's move to slash its dividend, along with the disclosure that it has come under regulatory scrutiny, will pose substantial problems.

Gelb cut his Berkshire A shares fourth-quarter EPS estimate to $1,726 from $3,522, and to $1.15 from $2.35 for the B shares. Berkshire is set to release those fourth-quarter earnings on Saturday.

The issues with Kraft Heinz aren't the only problems Berkshire faces. Last year was a tough one for insurers, and the conglomerate could feel some bite.

"The most recent quarter also included substantial catastrophe losses for the global [property and casualty] insurance industry" due to Hurricane Michael and wildfires in California "which we would also expect to negatively impact Berkshire's earnings," Gelb wrote.

For the full year, Gelb took down his earnings estimates to $13,316.88 from $15,112.15 for A shares and to $8.88 from $10.07 for B shares, both representing a 12 percent cut.

Despite earnings issues, the analyst kept his price target for both classes, which he sees as $375,000 and $250 respectively. The targets represent 21.8 percent upside for both shares from Thursday's close.

Kraft Heinz saw its shares tumble after the company said it was lowering its dividend to 40 cents a share, a 36 percent reduction, and said it had received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding procurement accounting policies.

That came on top of earnings and revenues that missed Wall Street estimates.

Gelb said he expects Buffett to address a number of topics this weekend, including plans for his succession, what the company will do with its more than $80 billion cash stockpile, the possibility of share buybacks, his views on global issues, and the state of the BNSF railroad and the company's energy investments.

—CNBC's Michael Bloom contributed to this report.

Thursday, February 21, 2019

Career Education (CECO) Updates Q1 2019 Earnings Guidance

Career Education (NASDAQ:CECO) updated its first quarter 2019 earnings guidance on Wednesday. The company provided earnings per share guidance of $0.30-0.32 for the period, compared to the Thomson Reuters consensus earnings per share estimate of $0.30. Career Education also updated its FY 2019 guidance to $1.11-1.15 EPS.

A number of research firms recently issued reports on CECO. Zacks Investment Research raised Career Education from a hold rating to a buy rating and set a $14.00 price objective for the company in a research report on Wednesday, January 16th. Barrington Research started coverage on Career Education in a research report on Sunday, December 9th. They set an outperform rating and a $13.49 price objective for the company. BidaskClub upgraded Career Education from a sell rating to a hold rating in a report on Wednesday, October 24th. Finally, ValuEngine lowered Career Education from a buy rating to a hold rating in a report on Friday, November 2nd. Four research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and two have assigned a buy rating to the company’s stock. The stock currently has a consensus rating of Hold and an average price target of $18.38.

Get Career Education alerts:

NASDAQ CECO traded up $0.07 during trading on Wednesday, hitting $13.94. 489,747 shares of the company traded hands, compared to its average volume of 245,019. Career Education has a 12 month low of $11.01 and a 12 month high of $19.07. The firm has a market cap of $967.57 million, a P/E ratio of 44.97, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 1.02 and a beta of 1.75.

In other news, SVP Jeffrey David Ayers sold 10,903 shares of Career Education stock in a transaction dated Thursday, January 24th. The stock was sold at an average price of $13.00, for a total value of $141,739.00. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which can be accessed through this hyperlink. Also, SVP Andrew Hurst sold 16,531 shares of Career Education stock in a transaction dated Monday, December 3rd. The stock was sold at an average price of $14.00, for a total value of $231,434.00. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Over the last 90 days, insiders have sold 38,352 shares of company stock worth $512,814. Corporate insiders own 5.70% of the company’s stock.

TRADEMARK VIOLATION NOTICE: This news story was originally reported by Ticker Report and is owned by of Ticker Report. If you are reading this news story on another website, it was stolen and reposted in violation of international copyright laws. The correct version of this news story can be read at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4166841/career-education-ceco-updates-q1-2019-earnings-guidance.html.

Career Education Company Profile

Career Education Corporation operates colleges, institutions, and universities that provide education to student population in various career-oriented disciplines through online, campus based, and blended learning programs in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Colorado Technical University (CTU), American InterContinental University (AIU), and All Other Campuses.

Featured Article: Technical Analysis

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

$1.00 Earnings Per Share Expected for Meta Financial Group Inc. (CASH) This Quarter

Equities research analysts expect Meta Financial Group Inc. (NASDAQ:CASH) to post earnings per share (EPS) of $1.00 for the current quarter, according to Zacks Investment Research. Two analysts have made estimates for Meta Financial Group’s earnings. The lowest EPS estimate is $0.87 and the highest is $1.13. Meta Financial Group reported earnings per share of $1.22 in the same quarter last year, which suggests a negative year over year growth rate of 18%. The firm is expected to announce its next earnings results on Monday, April 29th.

On average, analysts expect that Meta Financial Group will report full-year earnings of $2.52 per share for the current financial year, with EPS estimates ranging from $2.50 to $2.54. For the next year, analysts expect that the firm will post earnings of $3.51 per share. Zacks’ EPS averages are a mean average based on a survey of research firms that cover Meta Financial Group.

Get Meta Financial Group alerts:

Meta Financial Group (NASDAQ:CASH) last released its quarterly earnings data on Monday, January 28th. The savings and loans company reported $0.39 EPS for the quarter, missing analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.43 by ($0.04). Meta Financial Group had a net margin of 15.76% and a return on equity of 11.61%. The business had revenue of $98.02 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $98.55 million.

A number of research firms recently issued reports on CASH. Zacks Investment Research downgraded Meta Financial Group from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research note on Tuesday, November 13th. BidaskClub upgraded Meta Financial Group from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Thursday, January 31st. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, two have given a hold rating, one has assigned a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the stock. The company has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $36.75.

In other news, CEO Bradley C. Hanson purchased 20,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Thursday, December 6th. The shares were purchased at an average price of $21.43 per share, for a total transaction of $428,600.00. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which can be accessed through this hyperlink. Also, CFO Glen William Herrick purchased 5,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, December 7th. The shares were purchased at an average price of $21.02 per share, for a total transaction of $105,100.00. Following the purchase, the chief financial officer now directly owns 209,108 shares in the company, valued at $4,395,450.16. The disclosure for this purchase can be found here. Insiders have purchased a total of 25,466 shares of company stock worth $543,505 in the last 90 days. 7.69% of the stock is currently owned by company insiders.

Several hedge funds have recently made changes to their positions in CASH. Raymond James & Associates grew its stake in shares of Meta Financial Group by 43.8% in the 2nd quarter. Raymond James & Associates now owns 11,443 shares of the savings and loans company’s stock valued at $1,115,000 after purchasing an additional 3,487 shares during the last quarter. Bank of America Corp DE grew its stake in shares of Meta Financial Group by 148.1% in the 2nd quarter. Bank of America Corp DE now owns 27,709 shares of the savings and loans company’s stock valued at $2,699,000 after purchasing an additional 16,542 shares during the last quarter. Millennium Management LLC purchased a new position in shares of Meta Financial Group in the 2nd quarter valued at approximately $5,084,000. California Public Employees Retirement System grew its stake in shares of Meta Financial Group by 28.1% in the 2nd quarter. California Public Employees Retirement System now owns 21,238 shares of the savings and loans company’s stock valued at $2,069,000 after purchasing an additional 4,653 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Northern Trust Corp grew its stake in shares of Meta Financial Group by 6.8% in the 2nd quarter. Northern Trust Corp now owns 146,894 shares of the savings and loans company’s stock valued at $14,308,000 after purchasing an additional 9,394 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors own 24.57% of the company’s stock.

Shares of CASH traded up $0.52 during mid-day trading on Monday, reaching $24.96. The company’s stock had a trading volume of 209,344 shares, compared to its average volume of 364,334. The company has a market cap of $983.92 million, a P/E ratio of 8.88 and a beta of 1.32. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.12, a quick ratio of 0.66 and a current ratio of 0.66. Meta Financial Group has a 12-month low of $18.01 and a 12-month high of $39.28.

Meta Financial Group Company Profile

Meta Financial Group, Inc operates as the holding company for MetaBank that offers various banking products and services in the United States. The company accepts various deposit products, including statement savings accounts, money market savings accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal accounts, and checking accounts; and deposits related to prepaid cards, which primarily comprise checking accounts and certificate accounts.

Featured Story: Understanding Market Liquidity

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Meta Financial Group (CASH)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited  (NASDAQ:MLCO)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 19, 2019, 8:30 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in the Fourth Quarter of 2018 Earnings Conference Call of Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. After the call, we'll conduct a question-and-answer session. Today's conference call is being recorded.

Now, I'd like to turn the call over to Mr. Richard Huang, Director of Investor Relations of Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited. Please go ahead.

Richard Huang -- Director, Investor Relations

All right. Thank you for joining us today for our fourth quarter of 2018 earnings call. On the call today are Lawrence Ho, Geoff Davis and our property presidents in Macau and Manila.

Before we get started, please note that today's discussion may contain forward-looking statements made under the safe harbor provision of federal securities law. Our actual results could differ from our anticipated results. Also, I would like to highlight that all of the financials mentioned in the prepared remarks are denominated in US dollars.

With that, I'll now turn the call over to Lawrence.

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Richard. Hello, everyone. First, before I proceed with my opening remarks, I would like to express Melco's sincere gratitude to the Macau government for its consideration and approval of our gaming table application for operation from January 1st, 2019. We're highly appreciative of the approval to operate an additional 40 mass gaming tables at City of Dreams. We are grateful for the recognition that City of Dreams has in material revitalized following the significant investment we made in Morpheus, which is designed to help the SAR to be recognized as a world-leading travel and entertainment destination.

Moving on to our results. During the fourth quarter of 2018, Melco delivered record property EBITDA of $425 million, driven by robust mass gaming revenue growth at all of our Melco integrated resort. We remain bullish on Melco's long-term prospects with Macau being one of the most attractive integrated resort markets and with Melco being well-positioned to benefit from Macau's anticipated mass driven growth of our best-in-class premium mass-focused resorts.

Our optimism is evidenced by the company's repurchasing an incremental $165 million worth of shares. And then in addition to the $490 million of shares that were repurchased and announced with our third quarter results. Morpheus continues to receive overwhelmingly positive reception. After being ranked by TIME magazine as one of the world's 100 greatest places. The French Culinary experience brought by Alain Ducasse at Morpheus has recently been awarded with two Michelin stars in less than six months since its opening.

Moreover, Jade Dragon and City of Dreams has further lifted the benchmark from Cantonese fine dining by attaining the highly coveted three Michelin Stars destination. We are thrilled to achieve a record-breaking milestone with 10 Michelin Stars awarded among six of Melco signature restaurant. Solidifying Melco's leadership as the leading premium integrated resort operator in the world with the most Michelin Star restaurants and with the most Forbes Star awards.

Morpheus positive reception has translated into business improvements with CODs mass table GGR growth accelerating to 23% in the fourth quarter. Allowing for significant market share expansion in the high margin mass-market segment.

Going forward with further ramp of the iconic award winning Morpheus. We are confident in our ability to continue to drive revenue and market share improvement. Our confidence is also supported by further property upgrades at City of Dreams. With our VIP guests now enjoying a significantly upgraded gaming experience with renovation of the VIP area on the second floor completed just ahead of the Chinese New Year. Lastly, we will soon commence the rolling refurbishment of Nuwa, with the renovated hotel rooms, expected to be rolled out in phases over the next eighteen months.

Moving to Studio City, the property continues to enjoy solid mass gaming revenue performance. To drive to continued growth, we have exciting plans to enhance the entertainment offerings, which includes the recent launch of the world's first all-electric indoor theatrical stunt show Elekron. Developed in partnership with world-class entertainment architect Stufish and with the full support of the Macau SAR government, the show features powerful electric vehicles and daredevil stunts to keep audiences on the edge of their seats from start to finish.

Earlier in January, we also opened the pop-up Legend Heroes VR Park paving way for the opening of the 50,000 square feet permanent venue later in the year. Finally, the Flip Out Trampoline Park will be unveiled at Studio City in the next few months. Looking further out, the further expansion of Studio City is expected to have two hotel towers, a water park, a cineplex and additional gaming space. Altira continues to deliver strong year-over-year growth across all gaming segment with EBITDA growing 15% to reach $20 million in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Turning to the Philippines. The City of Dreams, Manila in the fourth quarter of 2018 delivered it's twelve consecutive quarter of luck adjusted EBITDA growth. However, the competition in and around entertainment city, we're more cautious about 2019 and beyond.

Finally, we are devoting significant resources on international expansion with a strong emphasis on Japan, which we have always viewed as the most attractive integrated resort opportunity globally outside of Macau. The license bidding process may start in 2019 or 2020 and we are gearing up for this process. We believe, we are well placed in Japan with a strong local team actively working on the ground engaging with the relevant stakeholders.

We also believe, our focus on the Asian premium segment, and portfolio of high quality assets, devotion to craftsmanship, dedication to world-class entertainment offerings, market-leading social safeguards system and an established track record of successful partnership will put Melco in a strong position to help Japan realize the vision of developing world-leading IRs with a unique Japanese touch.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Jeff to go through some of the numbers.

Geoffrey Stuart Davis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Lawrence. We reported groupwide property EBITDA of approximately $425 million in the fourth quarter of 2018, increasing by 25% from the fourth quarter of 2017, while luck adjusted property EBITDA declined 2% year-over-year to $369 million. A favorable VIP win rate positively affected EBITDA at COD Macau, Studio City, Altira and COD Manila by approximately $28 million, $11 million, $10 million and $7 million respectively.

In addition to the VIP win rate fluctuation, our performance was also affected by our bad debt provision. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we incurred a bad debt provision of $11 million as compared to a bad debt reversal of $3 million in the third quarter of 2018 and a reversal of $11 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. On a year-over-year basis, the change in the bad debt provision negatively affected EBITDA by approximately $22 million.

In the fourth quarter, the luck adjusted property EBITDA margin in Macau was approximately 27% up from 24% in the prior quarter and down from 29% in the fourth quarter of 2017. I would like to clarify that these are apples-to-apples comparisons. As the aforementioned margins are all calculated based on the new accounting standards, including those from the prior periods. With continued robust growth in the mass gaming revenues, the EBITDA contribution from our non-VIP segments now represents more than 90% of luck adjusted EBITDA on a Macau wide basis. Highlighting the mass gaming and non-gaming segments importance and driving groupwide EBITDA and EBITDA margins.

In the Philippines, COD Manila delivered luck adjusted EBITDA of approximately $61 million. representing an increase of 4% year-over-year. The luck adjusted EBITDA margin at COD Manila declined by approximately 120 basis points quarter-over-quarter, but increased by approximately 120 basis points year-over-year to 42%. The sequential EBITDA margin decline was due primarily to a $2 million, one-time back payment. Adjusting for that, the luck adjusted EBITDA margin from COD Manila would have been broadly flat quarter-over-quarter.

Moving on to capital management. The board has increased its quarterly cash dividend by 7% to $0.155 per ADS. Melco has also repurchased another $10 million ADS's worth approximately $165 million, which is in addition to the $490 million share repurchase announced with our third quarter results. The average repurchase price for the incremental $165 million of share repurchase was approximately $17 per ADS. To optimize our capital structure, Studio City has, in the past few months partially redeemed then refinanced its 2020 senior notes, which resulted in an extended maturity, lower gearing level and reduced interest expense of approximately $27 million per annum.

To provide more clarity regarding our capital structure within our core or wholly owned group, we had cash of approximately $660 million and gross debt of approximately $2.5 billion at the end of the fourth quarter of 2018, excluding Studio City and the Philippines. As we normally do, we'll give you some guidance on non-operating line items for the upcoming quarter. Total depreciation and amortization expense is expected to be approximately $155 million to $265 million. Corporate expense is expected to come in at approximately $30 million to $31 million and consolidated net interest expense is expected to be approximately $73 million, which includes financed lease interest of $10 million relating to City of Dreams Manila.

For those that follow City of Dreams Manila more closely, our building lease payment for the fourth quarter of 2018, was approximately $9 million. That concludes our prepared remarks. Operator. Back to you for the Q&A.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instruction). Your first question comes from the line of Anil Daswani of Citi. Please go ahead.

Anil Daswani -- Citi -- Analyst

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question and congratulations on a fantastic result. Lawrence, could you comment a little bit on what your thoughts have been for the Chinese New Year this year? How have things gone? And has there been any visible evidence of any impact from that Supreme Court ruling that came into effect on the 1st of February , that would be my first question. And the second question is, fantastic job on the whole rate in the mass business in the fourth quarter back at about 33%. How sustainable is that, is that something that's remained pretty flat at those levels or is it still improving into the first quarter?

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Hey, Anil. Its Lawrence here. Great to hear from you. On Chinese New Year, we are very happy about Chinese New Year as we all know there has been record visitation. But for us at City of Dreams and in particular at City of Dreams with the addition of Morpheus. And even at Studio City with the addition of Elekron, the new show, we have seen great foot traffic. And all the gaming KPIs and our key on KPIs have increased, so we are happy with Chinese New Year.

In terms of the Supreme Court ruling on the underground banking and some of those issues, our view is that it's always been law. The law has always existed, what China's done is really crystallize the punishment and the severity of that. I think it's a bit too early to tell, because after all, it was only recently announced and -- but in any case, we have been in close dialogue with our junket partners, and so we will monitor it very closely over the next few weeks, next few months.

For now, we don't see any major concern, especially not for Melco's main bread-and-butter, which is mass and premium mass. In terms of VIP, of course, we are going to be cautious on that. But so far is OK. And you know, the Chinese New Year was strong for us. So we're very happy. And in terms of your question, your second question on hold. I guess, you're referring to City of Dreams. In that case, let me turn the question to David to add more color.

David Sisk -- Property President, City of Dreams, Macau

Hi, Anil.

Anil Daswani -- Citi -- Analyst

Hi, David.

David Sisk -- Property President, City of Dreams, Macau

So it's a normal stuff that we talk about on our prior call. Our expectation is, we're probably going to hang in the low '30s. We think it's, we're pretty comfortable with that. Given what we've done with Morpheus and the impact Morpheus has had on our premium mass business, our mass business. We've also done some other changes on that main gaming core, We've also changed the pricing, as well as now also putting a new signature. Our new signature area over there for our premium mass. So again, we're very comfortable with this, and we think good things to come.

Anil Daswani -- Citi -- Analyst

Thank you, guys. Thanks for taking my questions.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Joe Greff of JP Morgan. Please go head. Yeah. Turning to Joe Greff. Please go ahead with your question. Your line is open now. [Operator Instructions]. Okay. Our next question is from Billy Ng of Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.

Billy Ng -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Hi, good evening, and congratulations on a very solid and strong result. One more question is on, in terms of the ramp-up. Obviously, in the fourth quarter, COD has a very fantastic ramp up and I think in the past management kind of guide that's like we should expect COD or the multi-year should return at least 20% in terms of ROIC. So like, have you after the probably had been in place for six months now and also like where are we exactly in terms of the ramp-up curve? Should we expect the development of first or second quarter, for this year and also do you think like the 20% return from Morpheus is a bit conservative at this point?

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Hey, Billy. It's Laurence here. I think Morpheus with Q4, with the strong results in Q4 is really starting to really starting to ramp-up. So I certainly look for much more improvements going forward, in terms of how Morpheus is integrating into the rest of City of Dreams. And as we mentioned earlier on, we opened a new VIP area that recently -- that opened just before Chinese New Year. So there's a lot of good stuff happening, but maybe I'll let David supplement.

David Sisk -- Property President, City of Dreams, Macau

Sure. You know I think obviously when you start off -- we opened the resort as something as significant as we've done with Morpheus. It's going to take time for that to kind of , really come to fruition here. Ultimately, I'm not sure what the, what the return is going to be on that. It's going to be a good return for us. But we still haven't completely optimized here from a revenue standpoint or from an expense standpoint. So I think that the returns will bear out of the next couple of years. But again, we're very pleased with the results so far, it's been very positive for us. It's been incredibly well received by not only our customers, but I think in general the hospitality industries.

Billy Ng -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

And Billy, just to supplement. I guess our 20% ROI is still in the long-term still intact. I don't know if we're going to have a perfectly linear quarterly sequential increase to get us there. But over time, we still believe that it will be a very good return, meet our hurdles, and we still think we have plenty of room for ramp-up.

Billy Ng -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Thanks. And my second question is regarding to return of capital, I think last year in the first half, like the company focus a bit more on raising the regular dividends and then and last few months, maybe because of the, the share price. And we noticed that the company spend a lot more on buyback. And then going forward like let's say if the stock price is remaining about 20 something dollars and, and in 2019, what kind of return of capital policy and what will be the focus in 2019?

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Well, our focus on returning capital, we're committed to returning capital to shareholders and I think we have a strong record, track record of doing that. The focus will remain on quarterly regular dividends, but at the same time, we'll be opportunistic and return capital through share repurchase, when that makes sense. And in the third quarter, we purchased about $440 million of shares in the fourth quarter, we repurchased $216 million of shares and again bringing that average price down to around $20 per share over the course of that entire buyback program. So we're very pleased with that. And we certainly wouldn't rule out further share repurchase, but it is opportunistic in our primary method of returning capital will be through the quarterly dividend, which you may have seen, we've increased again as of the fourth quarter.

Billy Ng -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Thanks. And one last question very quickly is I think in Q3, there were some bonus accrual happened and in Q4, could you clarify any accrual being taken during the fourth quarter?

Geoffrey Stuart Davis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

You're right. The third quarter had an extraordinary catch-up provision. While the fourth quarter had more of a normal provisioning across various buckets of our provisioning policy. We'd like to reiterate the idea that we did go from a reversal in our bad debt provision $211 million charge for -- for doubtful debts.

Billy Ng -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

So like what you're saying is fourth quarter the provision is at the normal level and that should be sustained for the next few quarters.

Geoffrey Stuart Davis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Well, there's always a certain amount of volatility in the bad debt provision but we will follow our, our normal policy and formulas for provisioning against outstanding debts. So I don't anticipate anything unusual, but I do think we're back into a more normal territory of bad debt provisions rather than reversals for the foreseeable future.

Analyst -- -- Analyst

Thank you.

Unidentified Speaker --

Thanks.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Harry Curtis of Instinet. Please go ahead.

Harry Curtis -- Instinet -- Analyst

Hey, good morning everybody. A quick question following up, David. The expected whole percentage in mass. It sounds like you're more comfortable with the improvement that you've seen into the low 30% range. Can you talk about how that fits with just the, the level of volume that you're seeing. Is it just increased volume that is going to push that back into the low, the low '30s or is there something else, you'd mentioned pricing, for example, that could be a policy shift?

David Sisk -- Property President, City of Dreams, Macau

No. it's -- this is something we've been working on for the last 12 months since I came over from Studio City. In terms of changing the pricing on the floor, I'm really trying to appeal to our premium mass business. And while we talked about we've got these other separate premium areas within the property, we've also like to thank our main gaming floor. If you look at the pricing you walk around. That's a pretty much a premium mass price for any place else in Macau or for that matter any place in the world. It's a few things, I think, one, as we talked about in terms of the increased volumes that we're seeing -- receiving as we've freshened up that for -- as we've got Morpheus, as we've gotten new premium space. But also what we're seeing too is people are playing longer, we're getting more players that are coming in, it's -- it's had a good impact for us. All those factors come into play -- kind of get us to a better hold percentage.

Harry Curtis -- Instinet -- Analyst

Very good and then a quick follow-up on for Geoff on the bad debt payment. I guess what I'm still struggling with is that the VIP piece of your business is, is so much smaller than mass. So I'm trying to understand why this, this increase is -- how to square your focus on mass and a rising debt. Is the debt provision actually going up or is there something going on with your customers, the VIP customers, your direct customers where they're just, they're just, it just paying later.

Geoffrey Stuart Davis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Well, I think what's been unusual is not sort of, what's happening in the fourth quarter and what we expect going forward. It's more of what's been happening over the last several quarters when we've registered reversals to our bad debt provision. As you'd expect, running this sort of business you would expect some normal level or some level of taking a bad debt charge quarter-to-quarter.

And again, that can be volatile but normal in normal times, I would say the expectation should be for a charge, whereas in the pass through very aggressive collections we've been able to turn that into a net, a net reversal. But going forward, I think a normal expectation for more normal levels of provision should be anticipated. I don't think we're seeing anything dramatically different when it comes to collections or credit quality, but we are looking very closely at that monitoring the situation with some of the other questions that came up on this call, just making sure that we're keeping our thumb on the pulse of what's happening. But as we said, we're not, we're not seeing anything really changing in the tone or tenor of the business and VIP or on our ability or in our perceived ability of the junkets to collect on their debt.

Harry Curtis -- Instinet -- Analyst

Okay. And then just a quick last one. Can you, you had mentioned the CapEx, CapEx projects. Can you give us a sense of, what you're planning to spend in 2019? And then any anticipated construction disruption?

Geoffrey Stuart Davis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This is Geoff. I'll take the CapEx question, maybe let my -- my colleagues handle the construction disruption question. But for 2019, we're expecting maintenance CapEx of approximately $165 million growth projects across the portfolio of roughly $350 million, so, little over $500 million of CapEx for 2019 excluding Studio City Phase 2.

Harry Curtis -- Instinet -- Analyst

Okay. And then the disruption question?

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Harry, it's Lawrence here. We are constantly looking for new offerings and -- and adding and improving our various gaming areas, nongaming areas in general. But I think the bulk of the disruption is behind us and the loss of which was the opening of the VIP area at City of Dreams. So Nuwa will be going through a rolling refurbishment, so there is going to be some disruption, but it's not going to be major as it's over 18 months. So I think all in all, we should have a relatively clean year from this point forward.

David Sisk -- Property President, City of Dreams, Macau

Yeah, I think if you go back -- and it's David. If you go back and look at 2018 for us, it was an incredibly painful year but it was some of the things we needed to do to get that for where we wanted it to be, but we had a lot of that area of the floor was hoarded up and created a lot of issues for us. We've also gotten through a lot of our smoking as well, so we've got our smoking rooms up and now, which we needed to construct on that main gaming floor.

So this next year, we really want to minimize the levels of disruption. So as Lawrence said, most of our disruption is probably going to come through and it will be minimal, but it will come through in the non-gaming areas. We've got little bit of disruption still as we finish up on level two for the VIP, but again that we're trying to minimize that as much as possible to be nothing like we saw in 2018.

Harry Curtis -- Instinet -- Analyst

That's great. Thanks very much.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is from Praveen Choudhary of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead with your question.

Praveen Chaudhary -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Thank you very much for taking my question. Congratulations, guys. Excellent results. I have just one question on the buyback. You have bought back $490 million before and then $165 million again. Could you tell us, if those shares have been canceled or the outstanding number of shares have reduced by now or will it be done in future. Thank you.

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The bulk of the shares are still held as treasury shares, but they are already reflected in reduced share count.

Praveen Chaudhary -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Okay. Great. Thank you and if I may add one more question. About the Studio City. Remember, you mentioned that you are calling back those VIP tables from them a year from now and then you receive 40 new mass tables from government. Just wanted to understand the utilization of those new tables. Are they proportionately getting you higher revenue and EBITDA or it is going to take some more time to ramp-up? Thank you.

David Sisk -- Property President, City of Dreams, Macau

So on the 40 tables. We've got those tables. We put them in place on the first of the year, 1st of January. There is some level of ramp-up on that, they've been very helpful for us during the CNY period. We've also distributed those to some of our premium mass areas. We've been able to bring more tables and those grade areas as well, but there is a normal ramp-up with those, but I think we'll be pretty happy with their overall results here. And we've been happy so far with what we've seen.

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

On the Studio City element, that's something that won't -- those tables will revert back in or in January of next year. So at that time, we'll assess sort of the relative performance across the Melco properties and make a decision about optimization. And that's what the decision was all about on the VIP tables. So it's just optimizing performance across, across the Melco portfolio, but that's a decision that will make closer to the time when those tables revert back.

Praveen Chaudhary -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Okay. Great. Thank you, Lawrence, Geoff, Andy and David. Great results all across. Thank you.

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Next is from Karen Tang of Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Karen Tang -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Hey, guys. It's Karen here. Breakup of(ph)on the great results. Three questions. Question one is, you guys have a very good premium mass segment. And you guys typically have the first pulse on how this segment is trending. My question is either on fourth quarter numbers or year to-date numbers. Can you let us know whether premium mass is growing faster or gaming mass is growing faster as Lawrence has said that your visitation growth over Chinese New Year to Macau has been very strong . The second question is, can you -- maybe, David, just can explain to us a little bit more about your second-floor upgraded VIP facilities as City of Dreams like, you know, which are the new junkets? Or who have more space? And finally, sorry, Geoff, can you repeat the good luck impact on each of the properties? Sorry, I didn't quite get it. Thank you.

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Maybe Geoff can -- so why don't me hand it to David to talk about.

David Sisk -- Property President, City of Dreams, Macau

Okay. So I think a couple of things there. One on the junkets on the second floor space, what we've done is we've increased the size of the spaces and created a lot more private rooms for our various junket operations. Suncity has got an amazing space, plus they've also got a private drop off. We've created a better access as you come in through the Morpheus side, the newest side of the building, that takes you straight up into our -- up into the VIP space. So everybody has kind of got in there. We're still waiting for Ocean Star to open up. They're going to open up sometime later this month. We've got probably five of the junkets opened in those spaces. Now, there is some other junkets that will kind of trail along as we get toward the end of the second quarter here. And then on the first question..

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

I think on the mass versus premium mass. I think they ever since City of Dreams and we've lost our smoking advantage, we're one of the first ones to lose it last July. And I think ever since then and given the new layout of the COD gaming floor, mass is growing very nicely. So it has grown probably side by side with premium mass. So I think there is a lot of synergies between the two businesses as is Studio City as well. So I think overall, they both are growing extremely, extremely well. I don't know Geoff or David or even Andy have any ---

David Sisk -- Property President, City of Dreams, Macau

The only thing I would add to Lawrence, real quickly, is that what we see is a lot of players that play in outside of both above the areas now. So like I said, our main floor at COD is really a premium mass floor as well as having premium mass areas from a traditional high limit or signature space that we've done. But players go back and forth constantly, chasing the trends.

Geoffrey Stuart Davis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Karen on your last question. So the impact per property, the positive impact at COD Macau was $28 million, Studio City was $11 million. Altira was $10 million and COD Manila was $7 million.

Karen Tang -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Excellent. I've got all the numbers then. Thank you.

Geoffrey Stuart Davis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Karen.

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

All right, operator. If there are no more questions. I think we are -- we can wrap it up.

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for participating. You may now all disconnect.

Duration: 37 minutes

Call participants:

Richard Huang -- Director, Investor Relations

Lawrence Ho -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Geoffrey Stuart Davis -- Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Anil Daswani -- Citi -- Analyst

David Sisk -- Property President, City of Dreams, Macau

Billy Ng -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Analyst -- -- Analyst

Unidentified Speaker --

Harry Curtis -- Instinet -- Analyst

Praveen Chaudhary -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Karen Tang -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

More MLCO analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Monday, February 18, 2019

Matador Resources (MTDR) Shares Up 6%

Shares of Matador Resources Co (NYSE:MTDR) shot up 6% during mid-day trading on Friday . The company traded as high as $19.32 and last traded at $19.31. 2,985,736 shares traded hands during trading, an increase of 41% from the average session volume of 2,116,764 shares. The stock had previously closed at $18.22.

A number of brokerages have recently issued reports on MTDR. ValuEngine cut Matador Resources from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Thursday, November 1st. Zacks Investment Research upgraded Matador Resources from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $36.00 target price for the company in a report on Monday, October 22nd. TheStreet cut Matador Resources from a “b-” rating to a “c+” rating in a report on Tuesday, November 6th. MKM Partners began coverage on Matador Resources in a report on Wednesday, December 5th. They set a “buy” rating and a $28.00 target price for the company. Finally, Stephens began coverage on Matador Resources in a report on Thursday, December 6th. They set a “weight” rating and a $29.00 target price for the company. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, seven have assigned a hold rating and nine have assigned a buy rating to the stock. The company has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $34.50.

Get Matador Resources alerts:

The firm has a market capitalization of $2.20 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 26.82, a P/E/G ratio of 0.63 and a beta of 2.00. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.62, a current ratio of 0.69 and a quick ratio of 0.63.

In related news, Director Reynald Baribault purchased 1,500 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction on Friday, December 14th. The stock was purchased at an average price of $17.47 per share, for a total transaction of $26,205.00. Following the acquisition, the director now directly owns 26,659 shares in the company, valued at $465,732.73. The acquisition was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which can be accessed through this hyperlink. Also, EVP Van H. Singleton II purchased 2,005 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction on Thursday, December 6th. The stock was bought at an average price of $22.26 per share, with a total value of $44,631.30. The disclosure for this purchase can be found here. In the last 90 days, insiders acquired 21,005 shares of company stock valued at $464,442. 11.10% of the stock is owned by company insiders.

Several institutional investors and hedge funds have recently made changes to their positions in MTDR. Rehmann Capital Advisory Group raised its position in shares of Matador Resources by 1,042.9% in the 4th quarter. Rehmann Capital Advisory Group now owns 1,863 shares of the energy company’s stock valued at $29,000 after purchasing an additional 1,700 shares in the last quarter. Nisa Investment Advisors LLC raised its position in shares of Matador Resources by 64.5% in the 4th quarter. Nisa Investment Advisors LLC now owns 2,550 shares of the energy company’s stock valued at $40,000 after purchasing an additional 1,000 shares in the last quarter. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund raised its position in shares of Matador Resources by 1,453.0% in the 4th quarter. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund now owns 634,633 shares of the energy company’s stock valued at $41,000 after purchasing an additional 593,768 shares in the last quarter. NumerixS Investment Technologies Inc raised its position in shares of Matador Resources by 89.4% in the 4th quarter. NumerixS Investment Technologies Inc now owns 8,002 shares of the energy company’s stock valued at $124,000 after purchasing an additional 3,777 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Dupont Capital Management Corp acquired a new position in shares of Matador Resources in the 4th quarter valued at approximately $152,000. 88.12% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors.

TRADEMARK VIOLATION NOTICE: “Matador Resources (MTDR) Shares Up 6%” was first posted by Ticker Report and is owned by of Ticker Report. If you are accessing this article on another publication, it was illegally stolen and republished in violation of US & international trademark & copyright law. The legal version of this article can be read at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4155370/matador-resources-mtdr-shares-up-6.html.

About Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR)

Matador Resources Company, an independent energy company, engages in the exploration, development, production, and acquisition of oil and natural gas resources in the United States. It operates in two segments, Exploration and Production, and Midstream. The company primarily holds interests in the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring plays in the Delaware Basin in Southeast New Mexico and West Texas.

Further Reading: Blue-Chip Stocks

Sunday, February 17, 2019

Barrett Business Services (BBSI) Upgraded by BidaskClub to “Hold”

Barrett Business Services (NASDAQ:BBSI) was upgraded by investment analysts at BidaskClub from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a note issued to investors on Thursday.

Several other analysts have also recently commented on BBSI. Zacks Investment Research cut shares of Barrett Business Services from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Monday, January 14th. ValuEngine cut shares of Barrett Business Services from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research note on Saturday, February 2nd. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, two have given a hold rating and two have issued a buy rating to the company. The stock has a consensus rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $88.33.

Get Barrett Business Services alerts:

Shares of NASDAQ BBSI opened at $70.79 on Thursday. The company has a quick ratio of 0.94, a current ratio of 0.94 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.04. Barrett Business Services has a 52 week low of $53.10 and a 52 week high of $98.76. The stock has a market capitalization of $498.74 million, a P/E ratio of 21.26 and a beta of 0.71.

In related news, COO Gregory R. Vaughn sold 7,488 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Monday, November 19th. The shares were sold at an average price of $71.33, for a total value of $534,119.04. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through the SEC website. Also, Director James B. Hicks sold 1,055 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, January 3rd. The shares were sold at an average price of $57.00, for a total transaction of $60,135.00. Following the completion of the sale, the director now owns 15,351 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $875,007. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders sold 16,778 shares of company stock valued at $1,073,227 in the last quarter. Company insiders own 6.60% of the company’s stock.

Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently made changes to their positions in the stock. Legal & General Group Plc increased its holdings in Barrett Business Services by 29.1% during the 4th quarter. Legal & General Group Plc now owns 1,349 shares of the business services provider’s stock valued at $77,000 after acquiring an additional 304 shares in the last quarter. SG Americas Securities LLC purchased a new position in Barrett Business Services during the 4th quarter valued at about $111,000. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. NY increased its holdings in Barrett Business Services by 393.8% during the 4th quarter. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. NY now owns 2,321 shares of the business services provider’s stock valued at $133,000 after acquiring an additional 1,851 shares in the last quarter. Citigroup Inc. increased its holdings in Barrett Business Services by 13.4% during the 4th quarter. Citigroup Inc. now owns 2,593 shares of the business services provider’s stock valued at $148,000 after acquiring an additional 307 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Great Lakes Advisors LLC purchased a new position in Barrett Business Services during the 3rd quarter valued at about $211,000. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 80.31% of the company’s stock.

About Barrett Business Services

Barrett Business Services, Inc provides business management solutions for small and medium-sized companies in the United States. The company has management platform that integrates a knowledge-based approach from the management consulting industry with tools from the human resource outsourcing industry.

Recommended Story: 12b-1 Fees

Saturday, February 16, 2019

Equities Analysts Issue Forecasts for Netflix, Inc.’s FY2019 Earnings (NFLX)

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NFLX) – Analysts at William Blair upped their FY2019 earnings per share (EPS) estimates for Netflix in a research report issued on Tuesday, February 12th. William Blair analyst R. Schackart now forecasts that the Internet television network will earn $4.14 per share for the year, up from their previous estimate of $3.90. William Blair also issued estimates for Netflix’s FY2020 earnings at $6.77 EPS.

Get Netflix alerts:

Several other brokerages have also issued reports on NFLX. BidaskClub upgraded shares of Netflix from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Wednesday, January 16th. Sanford C. Bernstein restated a “buy” rating and set a $421.00 target price on shares of Netflix in a research report on Wednesday, January 16th. JPMorgan Chase & Co. restated a “buy” rating and set a $435.00 target price (up from $425.00) on shares of Netflix in a research report on Friday, January 18th. UBS Group restated a “buy” rating and set a $420.00 target price (up from $410.00) on shares of Netflix in a research report on Friday, January 18th. Finally, Pivotal Research boosted their target price on shares of Netflix from $480.00 to $500.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Friday, January 18th. Six research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, eight have assigned a hold rating, thirty have given a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the stock. Netflix currently has an average rating of “Buy” and an average target price of $376.33.

Shares of NASDAQ NFLX opened at $356.87 on Thursday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.98, a current ratio of 1.49 and a quick ratio of 1.49. The company has a market cap of $153.58 billion, a P/E ratio of 133.16, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 2.90 and a beta of 1.38. Netflix has a 12-month low of $231.23 and a 12-month high of $423.21.

Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) last announced its earnings results on Thursday, January 17th. The Internet television network reported $0.30 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $0.24 by $0.06. The company had revenue of $4.19 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $4.21 billion. Netflix had a net margin of 7.67% and a return on equity of 25.82%. The firm’s quarterly revenue was up 27.4% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same period in the previous year, the business posted $0.41 earnings per share.

Several large investors have recently modified their holdings of the stock. Gemmer Asset Management LLC raised its stake in Netflix by 12.4% during the fourth quarter. Gemmer Asset Management LLC now owns 271 shares of the Internet television network’s stock valued at $73,000 after purchasing an additional 30 shares in the last quarter. Argent Trust Co raised its stake in Netflix by 4.2% during the fourth quarter. Argent Trust Co now owns 748 shares of the Internet television network’s stock valued at $200,000 after purchasing an additional 30 shares in the last quarter. Johnson Financial Group Inc. raised its stake in Netflix by 3.9% during the fourth quarter. Johnson Financial Group Inc. now owns 800 shares of the Internet television network’s stock valued at $214,000 after purchasing an additional 30 shares in the last quarter. Versant Capital Management Inc raised its stake in Netflix by 59.3% during the fourth quarter. Versant Capital Management Inc now owns 94 shares of the Internet television network’s stock valued at $25,000 after purchasing an additional 35 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Reilly Financial Advisors LLC raised its stake in Netflix by 5.2% during the fourth quarter. Reilly Financial Advisors LLC now owns 708 shares of the Internet television network’s stock valued at $190,000 after purchasing an additional 35 shares in the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 79.49% of the company’s stock.

In related news, CEO Reed Hastings sold 63,147 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Monday, December 24th. The shares were sold at an average price of $241.12, for a total transaction of $15,226,004.64. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief executive officer now owns 63,147 shares in the company, valued at $15,226,004.64. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is available through this hyperlink. Also, Director Anne M. Sweeney sold 7,607 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Tuesday, February 12th. The stock was sold at an average price of $360.00, for a total transaction of $2,738,520.00. Following the transaction, the director now owns 444 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $159,840. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. In the last 90 days, insiders have sold 220,252 shares of company stock valued at $62,279,115. 4.29% of the stock is owned by company insiders.

Netflix Company Profile

Netflix, Inc provides Internet entertainment services. The company operates in three reportable segments: Domestic streaming, International streaming, and Domestic DVD. It offers TV series, documentaries, and feature films. The company provides members the ability to receive streaming content through a host of Internet-connected screens, including TVs, digital video players, television set-top boxes, and mobile devices.

Read More: What is Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)?

Earnings History and Estimates for Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX)